← Back to ClaimPilot Guides

Compensation for Delayed or Lost Baggage — Advanced 2025 Guide

Delayed or lost baggage sits in a strange space: airlines are clearly responsible for it, but the rules are spread across international treaties, national regulations, and each airline’s own tariff. This guide pulls those pieces together so you understand the real ceiling of compensation and how to build a strong, evidence-based claim.

Important: This is general information based on published rules and guidance in 2024–2025, not legal advice. Always confirm details with the airline, regulator, or a qualified professional for your situation.

1. The legal backbone: Montreal Convention + local rules

Almost all international baggage claims are built on the Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99). It sets a global liability system that most major countries (including Canada, the US, and the EU) follow for international flights. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

Key idea: the “up to” limit is a ceiling, not an automatic payout. Airlines only pay what you can reasonably prove in costs and losses, within that cap.

How countries layer their own rules on top

For domestic flights in Canada or other countries, the airline’s own tariff (contract of carriage) may define rules, but many carriers simply mirror Montreal-style caps for simplicity.

2. When is baggage considered “delayed” vs “lost”?

Practically, many airlines start processing “lost” claims earlier (e.g., after 5–14 days) once it’s clear the bag isn’t turning up in the system search.

Why the distinction matters

3. What “reasonable expenses” actually means

Most airlines and regulators talk about “reasonable expenses” without defining it line by line. Practice and case law give some guidance:

Regulators and courts also look at delay length vs spend level. A 24-hour delay with a C$3,000 shopping spree looks very different than a 6-day delay with moderate spending spread out. Media-covered decisions in Canada have shown that overclaiming can trigger pushback or even counter-claims by airlines, even where some compensation was valid. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}

Practical calibration rule

Strong claims usually fit this pattern:

4. Hard deadlines you cannot miss

Across Montreal Convention jurisdictions, deadlines are strict and missing them can kill the claim completely. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}

“Written complaint” typically means email, web form, or letter that you can later prove was sent (ticket number, auto-reply, screenshot, etc.). Casual social media messages rarely count.

5. Building a strong, evidence-driven baggage claim

To get close to the upper end of what’s realistically payable — and not just a token amount — your claim should look more like an insurance file than a rant.

5.1. Core evidence package

5.2. Calculating your claim number

Airlines and regulators think in three buckets:

An advanced claim usually gives a clear table, for example:

6. How airlines push back — and how to respond

When claims get large, airlines often respond with one or more of these arguments:

Advanced responses focus on proportionality and evidence, not emotion. For example:

7. Role of travel insurance and credit card coverage

Many travellers have overlapping protection:

For advanced handling you should:

8. Escalating: when to go beyond customer service

If the airline’s final response is clearly out of line with the rules, escalation options vary by region:

These bodies rarely act as your personal lawyer, but their involvement often convinces airlines to revisit lowball settlements or procedural mistakes.

9. Using ClaimPilot to structure a high-quality claim

The main weakness in most baggage claims isn’t the facts — it’s the structure. People send scattered emails, attach random photos, and leave gaps in the story that give the airline room to cut the payout.

Turn a messy story into a clear, premium claim file.

With the ClaimPilot Lost / Delayed Luggage Pack, you get:

  • A pre-built timeline template that matches what airlines and regulators expect.
  • A main claim letter that uses Montreal / APPR-style wording while staying factual.
  • Follow-up and escalation templates if the first offer is too low.
Get the Lost / Delayed Luggage Pack

Quick recap